A Good Reason for Helmet Laws

Home ] Up ] Contact Information ]

I have a different take on the controversy about requiring the use of seat belts and helmets. Most people want to talk about the benefit for the person wearing the safety devices while I do not. Not that I do not care about people. I usually do not get involved in their harmful or dangerous activities, be it smoking, marrying the wrong person or not taking adequate safety precautions when driving.

            More to the point, I do not think much about their argument that it is their right to endanger themselves. Maybe it is their right when it does not affect me. However, what I think about is that sometimes I am a poor driver. Not by design, but by happenstance. You may say, Well, Michael, don’t drive dumb. It is easier said than done.

            A recent motorcycle accident injured an NFL quarterback and brought death threats to the woman driving the car. She did not get up that morning intending to run down a Pittsburgh Steeler Quarterback. Rather, she pulled out in front of him. From a legal standpoint, she was required to yield the right of way to him and did not. Therefore, she was entirely wrong in the accident. However, if he had been wearing protective gear and a helmet, he would have quite possibly not been injured.

            And that is the core of my argument. This is really about us, who in a lifetime of driving may have a bad moment. In a lifetime of driving, all of us will occasionally make driving errors. Example: you are driving down the street with your driver’s side window open when suddenly a swarm of bees fly in the window. Well, that is good for a few mad moments of distraction. So you inadvertently swerve out of your lane and bump a motorcycle in the next lane.

            For the purpose of our discussion, you are entirely wrong in this accident, though most people will understand how it happened. You stop. With your heart in your mouth, you go back to check on the motorcycle rider. You can see that he has landed in the ditch. If the rider is wearing appropriate clothing and a helmet, he steps out of the weeds and say, “Gee, Michael, please be more careful,” or words to that effect. You are eternally grateful that all you did was bend some metal and did not physical harm to the rider.

            If the other driver was not wearing a helmet and appropriate clothing, your bee driven boo-boo is ever so much more serious. I repeat, for the purpose of my scenario, you are entirely wrong. Likewise, if someone is not using a seatbelt and the same scenario happens and that person is ejected from their vehicle, bad things can happen. Again, you are wrong to have caused the accident but the accident is so much more serious because of the death of the other person.

            I believe it does no good to pass a law holding harmless the person who is wrong because they still have to help scrape someone off the pavement. It is horrible. Even though we are wrong, we do not deserve having a dead person in our memory.

            The legislature can deal with this by requiring adequate protection for all people riding a motorcycle. This includes helmet, shoes and protective clothing. I know that a law such as this infringes on the joy some people feel. I rode cycles for several years, however, I did wear protective clothing and a helmet. Several times people made a bee line for where I was driving and I just barely got out of their way. So, I never had to test the helmet, but I was protected.

            For the sake of all drivers who may have a bad moment in a lifetime of driving, the helmet and protective clothing law should cover all people on the streets. It is not just them whose are in danger. We, who are human when we drive, also need the protection.

© 2006  Michael Swickard, Ph.D.

Home  
        Last modified May 08, 2008